|
The
Worst President?
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this
war.
They complain about his prosecution of it. They point out
that
Iraq didn't attack the U.S. and we shouldn't have went to
war
with them.
One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in
U.S. history.
Most of these claims come from liberals in the Democratic
party.
Being an Independent I decided to take a look at history and
see
if using that criteria who else could be called the "worst"
president.
FDR ( a democrat) led us into World War II against Germany,
Italy, and Japan.
Neither Germany or Italy ever attacked us: Japan did.
From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of
112,500 per year.
That's 1 Democratic President, 4 years and 450,000 American
lives
Harry Truman (a democrat) finished that war and started one
in Korea, North
Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were
lost, an average
of 18,333 per year.
That's 1 Democratic President, 3 years, and 55,000 American
lives.
John F. Kennedy (a democrat) started the Vietnam conflict in
1962. Vietnam
never attacked us.
Lyndon B. Johnson (a democrat) turned Vietnam into a
quagmire. From 1965-1975,
58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Finally in the 1970's
Richard Nixon (a republican) pulled us out of Vietnam.
That's 2 Democratic Presidents, 1 Republican President, 13
years, and 58,000
American lives.
Bill Clinton went to war in Bosnia WITHOUT UN or French
consent, Bosnia
never attacked us.
The Clinton administration was offered Osama bin Laden's
head on a platter
three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us
on multiple
occasions.
In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President
Bush has liberated
two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put
nuclear inspectors
in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and
captured Sadaam
Hussein, who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.
We lost about 600 soldiers, an average of 200 a year. Bush
did all this
abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
That's 1 Republican President, 2 1/2 years, and about 600
American lives.
Then the Democrats complained about how long the war on
terror is taking,
but...
It took less time to take Iraq than it TOOK JANET RENO TO
TAKE THE
BRANCH DAVIDIAN C0MPOUND! THAT WAS A 51 DAY OPERATION!
We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq
for LESS TIME THAN
IT TOOK HILLARY CLINTON TO LOCATE THE ROSE LAW FIRM RECORDS
IN HER OWN OFFICE!
It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the
Marines to destroy
the Medina Republican Guard than it took TED KENNEDY TO CALL
THE POLICE AND GIVE
HIMSELF UP AFTER HE HAD AN ACCIDENT WHILE DRUNK AND SANK HIS
OLDSMOBILE IN
THE CHAPPAQUIDIK RIVER KILLING THE YOUNG LADY WHO WAS HIS
PASSENGER!
And Finally...
IT TOOK LESS TIME FOR THE U.S. MILITARY TO TAKE IRAQ THAN IT
DID TO COUNT THE
VOTES IN FLORIDA IN 2000!!!!
But for some reason the Democrats didn't complain about how
long any of that took! Hmmm.....
Let me know your thoughts.
Back to LiberalScum.com |