|
Fat man
with no Dick on rampage
!!!
LIBERAL ALERT !!!
If it’s
not bad enough that Cholesterol hasn’t built up in his arteries
quick enough, this fucker is still alive. I’ve never seen a more
Commie liberal in my life. Apparently Mr. Un-American has a new
Ultra Left wing book out called “Stupid White Men”. The
book's Name may lead you to conclude that it is indeed a book
about Democrats but on the contrary it’s a book about putrid
liberal ideology.
Among
the less-than-glowing reviews: “Unpatriotic, Marxist drivel
written by a spoiled brat, baby boomer.” “Michael Moore cannot
even compose sentences.” These and others are posted on
Amazon.com’s website were I guess all the un-patriotic
liberal tree huggers
Out
there have made it number 1. The book which is officially
titled Stupid White Men ...and Other Sorry Excuses for the
State of the Nation!
Has no
redeeming value what so ever. I’ve sorted through most of the
Liberal reviews to bring you a more Honest system of reviews
from Amazon. And here they are.
 Liberal
bias and unfair!, February 24, 2002
Reviewer: A reader from Mountain Home Air Force Base, ID
USA
This author is uneducated and has no factual basis for his book.
He writes fallacies left and right! To read this book will
poison your mind with garbage. He disrespects the leaders of
this country who have done so much for this country and commends
former leaders who have destroyed the integrity of this country
This
is a joke, February
24, 2002
Reviewer: A reader from Los Angeles, CA
What a waste of paper. This whole book is full of wild
accusations that have no basis of truth whats so ever. Its just
another liberal who demonizes the hard working succesful people
of the world and expects them to fund the non-working, un
motivated & the uneducated. If you want to see the mind-set that
is destroying the very foundation this country was founded on
this is the book to read.
Just
Call Me James Carville Jr., February 24, 2002
Reviewer: A reader from Anderson, sc United States
Another collection of Liberal Drivel & half truths.All we need
to do is elect Jesse Jackson President ,Al Sharpton VC. and get
rid of all the "fat white guys in dickeys"
I
wish I had my money back, February 24, 2002
Reviewer: kevin@bratcher.cc from New York, New York, USA
This book is horrible. It isn't witty and the probelms he states
are not real, they are only made up liberal fantasies. No one in
America is as bad off as this Bozo makes them out to be. The fat
author of this book needs to go back to school..he only has a
high school diploma...figures.
Absolute
hypocrisy, February
24, 2002
Reviewer:
kyle (see more about me) from escondido, ca United
States
Moore reviles capitalism while directly benefiting in it. He
condemns the US while prospering under its protection. And
here's a politically incorrect fact: judging people by race is
racist--even when you do it to white males.
The
Liberal Bible, February 23, 2002
Reviewer: kdover001 from Hoboken, NJ United States
If you hate this country this book is for you, it basically is a
cry & moan session from a man who believes Socialism, where no
one has any incentive to do anything is a path to a better
future for the country. It's the typical I hate the military, I
hate Corporate America and I hate anyone who actually believes
people should earn a living BS that you hear from every far left
liberal on a daily basis. For liberals, you may find amusing but
it's the same rhetoric heard everyday on talkshows, for
conservatives you'll take comfort that no one in their right
mind would ever take any of this insanity seriously or if they
did they would have already moved to France where they belong
Exactly
what you'd expect., February
23, 2002
Reviewer: A reader from Maryland, United States
A typical liberal hitpiece on American society in general and
the Bush administration in particular. Moore starts out with his
conclusion (essentially, that American society and most of our
values suck), and repeats it again and again with slight
phrasing changes for 300 pages. His prose is neither subtle nor
witty, and the reader would be hard-pressed to find any insights
or deeper meanings in this book. The title really does say it
all - Moore considers America a bunch of "Stupid White Men".
Written by and for
the extreme left, Stupid White Men... offers very little to
rational people. Its only conceivable appeal could be to readers
who are firmly in his camp already, as a sort of literary two
minutes of hate for America. The only real surprise here is that
it is selling so well; one would think his fanbase would be too
busy trashing the streets outside economics conferences or
committing arson at ski-resorts to find the time to read this.
Just a
little sample of the overwhelming discord for this liberal piece
of shit. Mr. Moore I respect the rights of people to use the
first amendment to cover for their Un-American activities but
this swill is beyond the pale. Even for Middle aged white man
who still lives at home with his Mom and is undoubtedly a
Virgin. May you rot in hell liberal scum!
Did Michael Moore
deceive Academy?
'Bowling for Columbine' failed to meet Oscar submission rules
Posted: September 2, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern
By
Joseph Farah
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
Michael Moore, winner of the 2002 Oscar for Best Documentary
for his controversial "Bowling for Columbine," failed to meet
submission requirements of the
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, a WorldNetDaily
investigation reveals.
While critics of the filmmaker and author have called on the
academy to investigate whether Moore fabricated scenes in the
movie, it also appears he misled the academy about the film's
eligibility on purely technical grounds.
Candidates for Best Documentary feature have unique
procedural requirements for eligibility. According to Rule 12,
qualification for the 75th Annual Academy Awards in this
category demanded that films be exhibited in a commercial
theater for paid admission for seven consecutive days in either
Los Angeles County or Manhattan prior to Sept. 30, 2002, and
that the entire engagement of the theatrical run be displayed in
a major newspaper's movie pages.
While "Bowling for Columbine" reportedly had its qualifying
run at Laemmle's Fallbrook 7 in Los Angeles County from Monday,
Sept. 9, through Sunday, Sept. 15, the required major newspaper
ads were never published.
A search through a library microfilm archive of Los Angeles
Times issues from Friday, Sept. 6, through Sunday, Sept. 15,
2002, turned up only four published performances of "Bowling for
Columbine" in the movie pages. Those performances were at 10
a.m. on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday at Laemmle's
Fallbrook 7. Laemmle's Fallbrook 7 had no films listed for
either Friday morning, Sept. 6, or Friday morning Sept. 13.
"Bowling for Columbine" had no listing at all in the days
following Thursday, Sept. 12.
A run of only four days would fail to satisfy the
requirements of Rule 12. Even a run of seven days accompanied by
published notice of only four days' performances would fail to
satisfy the requirements of Rule 12.
While in 2001, the academy required submission of photocopies
of newspaper movie pages containing the qualifying ads or
listings, in 2002, the photocopies were no longer required.
Michael Moore (courtesy United
Artists) |
Even before the latest findings, "Bowling for Columbine" was
already one of the most controversial movies of its time. The
film ostensibly blames the Columbine High School massacre on the
U.S. military-industrial complex, as Littleton, Colo., is home
to a Lockheed Martin factory. Moore suggests the factory makes
weapons of mass destruction. In fact, it makes rockets that
carry TV satellites into space.
At the March 23 Oscar festivities, Moore received a standing
ovation when he won the award. But when he launched into a fiery
criticism of President Bush and the Iraq war, his remarks were
met with a cacophony of boos.
"We are against this war, Mr. Bush," he shouted. "Shame on
you, Mr. Bush. Shame on you!"
Dan Gifford, an Academy Award nominee himself, has called on
the academy to investigate whether Moore "fabricated scenes and
video of real people that has been edited to manufacture a
fictional reality intended to mislead viewers."
If it is determined those accusations are true, Gifford, the
producer of "Waco: The Rules of Engagement," wrote to Bruce
Davis, executive director of the academy, Moore should be
stripped of the Oscar and it should be awarded to the runner-up.
"Failure to conduct such an investigation and act according
to its findings will diminish the stature of the Oscar,
establish an exploitable precedent for future rule violators and
be grossly unfair to the other nominees who did follow the
rules," Gifford wrote. "That unfairness will be particularly
bitter to those whose film would have been nominated in place of
'Bowling for Columbine.'
"Even the accusation of such rule violations taints the
Academy Award with implications of politics and favoritism that
are most damaging," he continued. "So, I again respectfully ask
that you not delay your attention to this matter."
That letter was written April 21. Repeated attempts to reach
Davis by telephone were unsuccessful.
Moore was unresponsive to e-mail requests for an interview
and phone calls to his publicist.
As for the latest controversy over the film, Gifford was not
surprised. Nor did he think the eligibility issue will have much
resonance in Hollywood.
"On the political left, ends justify means," he said. "So,
even if Michael Moore lied in his film to promote a leftist
vision, his lies are defended as truth by those who agree with
him."
Even if he lied in his submission to the academy, Gifford
concluded, that deceit, too, would be overlooked by those who
agree with him – including the vast majority of the
entertainment-industry elite.
Los Angeles radio talk-show host and WorldNetDaily columnist
Larry Elder is currently working on a documentary called
"Michael & Me," patterned after Moore's "Roger & Me," but
turning the tables on the filmmaker. He, too, is incensed about
the way Moore has taken liberties with the truth in his
"documentaries."
"As far as I know, the academy is doing nothing," Elder said.
At least two websites have been established to refute
"Bowling for Columbine" and address other charges by Moore. They
are
RevoketheOscar.com and
Moorelies.com.
Miramax, a Walt Disney Company, is bankrolling Moore's latest
project, "Fahrenheit 911," a film that will reportedly show
audiences the U.S. government and President Bush were culpable
for Osama bin Laden's Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
"Bowling for Columbine" has grossed over $21 million.
Besides his Oscar honors, the jury at the Cannes Film
Festival in France created a special, one-time-only award to
honor "Bowling for Columbine" and gave it a 13-minute standing
ovation.
If you'd like to sound off on this issue, please take part in
the
WorldNetDaily poll.
Earlier stories:
Michael Moore website in Oscar hack attack
Disney to finance Moore's Bush-bash
Michael Moore's Oscar targeted
Michael Moore likes U.S. 'to some extent'
Michael Moore booed trashing Bush at Oscars
Post your thoughts on this story
Back to LiberalScum.com |
