Welcome to Liberalscum.com | Make our site your homepage  
 

Hate Mail (Rants)

 

 Ranting (lies) from the left Hate mail


From: Nick Graziano [mailto:nickgraz@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thu 8/18/2005 1:09 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: the left goddamn muther fucking answer to these asshole cocksucking assholes

 
You are an asshole. george bush is an ass hole and I want you to post this
hate mail on youre site. The truth
Square miles of
counties won




Bush    2.54 million


Kerry   592,000
Population (2003) of
counties won




Bush    159,2 million


Kerry   130.9 million
States won by: Kerry=19
Bush=31
________________________________________
Population of counties won by:  Gore=127 million  Bush=143 million

Square miles of land won by:  Gore=580,000  Bush=2,2427,000

States won by:  Gore=20  Bush=30

Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:  Gore=13.2  Bush=2.1
And all this is bull shit….look it up….the elections were rigged. Why do u
think it was so fucked up in florida. The patriot act is bull shit too.
That’s what the Russians were doing and look how they turned out with their
secret police and all that  shit….fuck you
 

From: Joe Nalf [mailto:joenalf@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thu 6/30/2005 11:32 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Hypocrite

 
It's truly funny how hypocritical you are.

For someone proud to live in the land of the free and the home of the brave,
you are probably the biggest coward on the web.  Way to not fight in Iraq so
you can spend your time creating a ridiculous website, not use your real
name, and promote free speech as long as it agrees only with you.

What's more amusing is this:  even though you voted for the current
Bu(ll)sh(it) administration:
- Your price of gas went up, just as mine.
- You complain about border security, but it's your president who isn't
doing anything to stop illegal immigration.  In fact, he's trying to make it
easier for Mexicans to work in the US through the guest worker program.
- Your energy costs went up, same as mine.
- The quality of your school went downhill thanks to "No Child Left Behind",
same as mine.
- CEO's and other NeoCon cheats have laid off tens of thousands of US
workers all over the country robbed them of their retirement, especially at
United Airlines and Enron.  Automakers in Detroit saw record profits on
Large SUV's but hardworking Americans get laid off.
- The average family will pay more for their kids to go to college since
Bush cut funding to the Pell Grant program.
- Social security will be robbed to pay off the war.

Instead of helping America, Bush is helping Iraq.

I love the fact that you voted for this guy who has so completely fucked you
over and you continue to allow him to do it.  There are definitely more
NeoCon complainers today than liberals.  Liberals are concerned mostly about
the effect of Iraq on domestic issues.  NeoCons complain about just about
everything else in America (immigration, price of gas, PBS) and call
liberals complainers??  You are so miserable it's comical.  Next time you
fill up your $50K truck with $80 worth of gas and run up your credit card
debt so high that you can't pay it off, you can thank Mr. Bush that he
allowed the bankruptcy bill to pass so that you have to actually re-pay what
you can't afford in the first place.  Oh, and when your kids are stuck in a
community college for 8 years because they can't afford to get into a good
school, or couldn't get a scholarship because their piss-poor high school in
the middle class suburbs suddenly got worse, you can thank Mr. Bush.  Or,
when your kids have no options but to join the military and die, thank Mr.
Bush.  Or when you have to work until your 70 because Bush wants to raise
the retirement age, even though there's really nothing in the Social
Security System for you, and that whole private accounts thing only
benefited the rich, you can look back and say "hey, at least I created a
website to defend everything that's happening right now."

The joke is on you.  HAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!
 

From: Randy Callison [mailto:rcallison@decaturnet.org]
Sent: Wed 6/29/2005 12:06 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Sweden=Socialism

 

Just happened on your site while trying to refresh my tiny brain as to what the facts where concerning the WMD inspections before we invaded Iraq.  Question:  since you blast the inspectors, and Mr. Blix in particular, tell me (and no unprovable theories about shipping WMD to Syria before the invasion), where are the WMD that they were supposed to find?  If they weren’t in-country when we invaded, then Blix and the inspectors actually accomplished their mission, didn’t they?  As opposed to Bush’s “Mission Accomplished”?  Now, follow the logic, if you can:

 

1)     No connection between Iraq and the 9/11 hijackers has ever been proven

2)     Bush ran the inspectors out of Iraq before they completed their mission, although he later said that Saddam had booted them out (a lie or a delusion?)

3)     Most of the hijackers were Saudis

4)     Most of the foreign fighters now in Iraq are Saudis

5)     Why, if part of this misbegotten invasion was to take the war to the terrorists, did we not invade Saudi Arabia?

6)     Why have we not finished the job in Afghanistan.  It’s as bad there now as it was when Russia occupied it.

7)     Why won’t these “good Christian men and women” who lied us into this disaster in Iraq admit even one little “over or under estimation” or even own up to their words before the invasion?  Why do these people continue to lie.  As a Christian myself, I have always been taught that true Christians don’t lie.  If people do lie, then they are what Jesus called “tares” in Matthew Chapter 13.


From: Mark Mulligan [mailto:markmulligan@att.net]
Sent: Sat 6/25/2005 9:39 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Francophobia: last refuge of the lesser American bigot

 
You closet bigots have got to maintain a secret handshake, don't you?
Insulting Blacks, Orientals and Latinos is forbidden; but you feel
compelled to cross-infect each other with latent bigotry, am I not
correct?  Reassure yourselves your stupidity and ignorance are not
exceptional?

So now it's the French.  I'll bet you've never had a significant
conversation with a French person.  As if one conversation, or a
hundred, were enough to justify such sweeping absurdities.  Next year,
it will be Luxemburgers, or Singaporese, or Guyanans.  What do you care?
The incoherence of your rage is as meaningless as it is stupid.  You're
all a bunch of small-town, small mind Yahoos looking to herd.

Do you realize how bad you make yourself look, what kind of diseased
image you project out into the world -- on your own behalf and that of
this nation, otherwise great?

I have only one intolerance, and you and your kind are at ground zero of
it. --


From: Tom [mailto:Tom@trustaccess.com]
Sent: Mon 5/23/2005 11:57 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Ted liberal cocksucker kennedy

 
if the laws were right you'd be in  jail for inciting people  to murder 

From: Ginny Cornett [mailto:ginnycornett@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wed 5/18/2005 8:59 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: democrats as racists

 
your information on
http://www.liberalscum.com/democratsracist.html is
basically correct but fatally flawed.  the democratic
party of the early-mid 20th century was very different
than it is now.  the racists in the democratic party
all switched their membership to the rnc in the late
'50s and early 60's (like strom thurmond and others).
strom thurmond was an ardently against civil rights
when in the democratic party - and also as a
republican.  the democratic party was founded by noted
conservative thomas jefferson as the "party of the
common man".  the party line has not changed, just the
individuals in it - the racists have moved to the rnc.
 robert byrd is one of a few exceptions of those who
stayed with the democratic party.  and if strom
thurmond can change his stripes and embrace racial
equality then so can robert byrd so history means
nothing - you can't have it all your way.

From: Tony [mailto:ascamp2@verizon.net]
Sent: Tue 5/17/2005 5:37 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: You are a scumbag

 
I like how you throw the term communism around like it's always a bad
thing.  If communism is excuted the right way, and truly has THE PEOPLE
controlling the means of manufacturing, then it's not really a bad form
of government.  What the U.S.S.R. called communism, was the futhest
thing from actual communism is you can get.  Educate yourself, that is,
if your inbred brain is capable.

From: stacey lovato [mailto:spl@kricket.net]
Sent: Sat 3/19/2005 9:06 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: The right answer

 
why is it when bill clinton had a sex scandal, the republicans tried to impeach him---noone got hurt, but his family.  when bush lied, it wasn't even considered(impeachment) and AMERICANS are dying and getting hurt for life and no the senate did not get the same intel that bush got.  they didn't even want to give up the name of the companies that were involved in chaneys energy meeting and that had nothing to do with national inteligence.  Now you tell me that bush was honest and up front with the senate and us the AMERICAN PEOPLE!

From: Billy Ray Dirt [mailto:xyuuyx@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thu 3/10/2005 2:12 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: This will be read because I am white

 
The three main themes of this website and the people it represents: 
ignorance, bigotry, and rampant divorce from reality

It is four months since the election and you are still attacking Democrats
for losing an election that was won on widespread ignorance and buzz words
like "moral values".  You post irrelevant statistics about the square miles
of area won by Bush.  Isn't graciousness a moral value?

You know why people in cities tend to vote Democratic?  Because they are
more informed about the real world and when you live in a densely populated
area, you start to see that America is not only white Christian people.

You don't care how you came into power, you only care that you are.  It
doesn't matter if daddy's friends put your leader into power.  And in 2004,
it doesn't matter that Bush could not have won his first election without
the help of ignorance, exploitation, and a nauseatingly uninformed
electorate.

While you stroke yourself about 2004, Bush is ruining the GOP because he is
only concerned about pleasing his right wing minority base.  That means he
is pissing on the moderate majority.  You are unaware of this because you
are too busy being sore winners against Democrats.

You are proud to be Conservative Christians, but you are too stupid to
realize that is a contradiction, since Christ was one of the most liberal
figures in history.

You are proud to call yourselves Christians, but you are too stupid to see
that Bush rewords the word of God in order to advance his agenda.  You
probably don't know what blasphemy is either.

You want to see the twentieth century repealed and you miss the days of
1890s America.

You would have invaded Australia after Pearl Harbor.

Lying about a blow job is the devil, but lying about going to war is fine.

Soft on terrorism?  I think that giving Osama Bin Laden a two month head
start after 9/11 and then picking a fight with his neighbor, which gives him
free propaganda when the Muslim world sees our troops inside of a mosque
cursing and then killing an innocent man, torturing prison inmates, and
invading a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, is not only soft on
terrorism, it is pumping it full of steroids.

You still think there were WDMs found and you still think 9/11 came from
Iraq.

Flip flopping about talking about war funds is a clear danger to our
country, but Bush flip flopping his rationales for going to war, in 2002 and
still today, is AOK.

After your 12 hour minimum wage shift at the steel mill, you come home with
barely enough money for the bills, upset about family values and being away
from your family all day, then you go vote to give your CEO a tax break and
to make sure you never get out of it.

You are pro-life?  Did you know that under Clinton abortion rates were very
low, but now with Bush they have shot up again.  Clinton funded family
planning programs so there were more options than having an abortion.  Bush
doesn't give a shit.

You think pro choice means pro abortion.  No one wants an abortion, but the
only person who can really decide what to do is the mother, not a bunch of
redneck white chauvinist bigots who call themselves Christian, but don't
really live up to it.  Pro-life = anti-choice is more accurate.

Bush does not want to see Roe v. Wade overturned.  That is how Republicans
get elected.

Have you ever noticed that your leaders talk Christ and values to get
elected, but once they are in office all they focus on is how to make
themselves richer?  They never deliver on abortion or "values".  They do
that to keep the backlash pot boiling, so that you morons will return them
to office again to remain impotent on these issues.  You will not hear
anything about abortion or values or family values or moral values from your
leaders until 2006 and 2008.

You think the government can really deal with vague, intangible cultural
grievances?  It is free market capitalism that declines our culture, not
liberalism.  If you still don’t believe it, isn’t it the conservative
movement’s goal to restore unregulated free market capitalism?  Yes.  It is
you who are killing us.

What do you want the government to do about it?  Go on TV and start telling
people to “Please have better values” “Get better family values”  “Have
better morals.  Please?”

What they can do is improve the economy, or balance the budget, fix the
deficit, which are thing you don’t know how to do

You blame life’s problems on liberals, even though they are caused by free
market capitalism, who you would have anal sex with if it were a person.

You are more afraid of boys kissing than Osama Bin Laden.

If Bush's anti-gay amendment ever passes, it will be the first time in our
history that the constitution of the United States is used to remove
people's rights.  That is anti American.

You don't see or you refuse to accept that conservatives pick on, trick, and
exploit middle class America, which I suspect is 90% of your readers, so
that they can make themselves more powerful, and more rich.  You vote
republican to get even with those elites in Hollywood and Wall Street.  That
is the most idiotic thing about your whole movement.

That’s right.  Your whole movement is a hideous machine that forms an
alliance between the poorest people in America to the richest people in
America.

I used to think you people just had a different idea of how to run things,
but if this website truly represents you, you really are just a bunch of
fucking morons leading the destruction of all the great work the legitimate
presidents have done before 2001.

- An average, informed vote

From: Mad Minion [mailto:madminion@ecentral.com]
Sent: Wed 2/16/2005 7:00 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: The right answer

 
fair enough, there have been racist Democrats, but a quick look ar the Republicans since they have been the conservative party (yes, Lincoln was a Republican, but that was when they were the liberal party. People considered him a liberal)  shows that by far they were worse. Just a little look at Barry Goldwater and J Edgar Hoover.
And just trust me, you're comments on Islam will make you look like religious bigots in about fifty years. Stop and actually read the Koran instead of the prepackaged right wing sent in the mail to you. The Koran talks much less about kill everyone in your path unless they convert.
And give up on the "liberal media claim". Even Rush gave up on that, and me, who lives in a Liberal town with two papers (which tend to be more liberal than news), both supported Bush.
So so long, god bless, and hope you like being hated fifty years from now.
fuck you

From: Jordan Carrillo [mailto:carrillo_124@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thu 2/10/2005 5:51 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject:

 
1. In 1963 John F. Kennedy was shot and killed by
a. Superman
b. Jay Lenno
c. Harry Potter
d. A white male between the ages of 17 and 40

2. In 1996 at the Atlanta Olympics, spectators in a
public park were bombed by
a. Olga Corbett
b. Sitting Bull
c. Arnold Schwarzenegger
d. A white male between the ages of 17 and 40

3. In 1953, the democratically-elected government of
Iran was overthrown with the assistance of
a. Lost Norwegians
b. Elvis
c. A tour bus full of 80-year-old women
d. American white males mostly between the ages of 17
and 40

4. During the 1980's a number of people were kidnapped
in the U.S. by
a. John Dillinger
b. The King of Sweden
c. The Boy Scouts
d. White males mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

5. In 1993, part of Bishopsgate was blown up by
a. A pizza delivery boy
b. Pee Wee Herman
c. Geraldo Rivera
d. White males mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

6. In 1995 the Federal Building in Oklahoma City was
bombed by:
a. Richard Simmons
b. Grandma Moses
c. Michael Jordan
d. White males between the ages of 17 and 40

7. In 1999, the Chinese embassy in Belgrade was bombed
by
a. Mr. Rogers
b. Hillary Clinton, to distract attention from Wild
Bill' s women problems
c. The World Wrestling Federation
d. White males between the ages of 17 and 40

8. In November 1972, an airliner was hijacked; the
hijackers threatened to crash the plane into the Oak
Ridge nuclear facility, and they were
a. Bugs Bunny, Wiley E. Coyote, Daffy Duck and Elmer
Fudd
b. The Supreme Court of Florida
c. Mr. Bean
d. White males between the ages of 17 and 40

9. In 1942-45 the United States fought a war in Europe
against:
a. Enron
b. The Lutheran Church
c. The NFL
d. White males mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

10. In 1998 student Matthew Shepard was kidnapped and
murdered by:
a. Bonnie and Clyde
b. Captain Kangaroo
c. Billy Graham
d. White males between the ages of 17 and 40

11.  In 1981, four men, including President Ronald
Reagan, were shot by:
a. Scooby Doo
b. The Tooth Fairy
c. Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid
d. A white male between the ages of 17 and 40

I really don't see a pattern here to justify
profiling, do you?

From: Doak Harbison [mailto:dharbison@bcps.k12.va.us]
Sent: Mon 1/31/2005 4:46 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Blue states, they needed the money

 
How do you account for the vast differences in taxation between red and
blue states? The fact that is nearly every Blue state pays more to the
Federal government than it receives in goods and services and nearly every
Red state pays less than it receives from Washington. New York City pays
more to DC than the entire confederacy if you eliminate TX and FLA. Blue
cities also subsidies red counties across America. California has paid 480
billion dollars more to the Feds over the past decade than it receives. If
you conservatives are so self reliant, quit taking the federal handouts!
You are a bunch of self righteous welfare queens!

From: Kearns, Kevin [mailto:KKearns@enchem.com]
Sent: Wed 1/26/2005 11:04 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Racial profiling - reply

 
Iraq was conquered by:
a) Bill Clinton
b) George H.W. Bush
c) Stalin
d) A fanatic that wrapped himself in the remains of 3000 americans

The Edward Murrah Federal building was destroyed by:
a) Muslim Male extremist between the ages of 17 and 40
b) a former US soldier that was trained by the US and distinguished himself
in The first Iraqi war
John F. Kennedy was killed by:

a) A muslim extremist etc etc etc
b) Lee harvey oswald
c) His own government
d) any of the above except for (a)

The gov't of Iraq, and eventually Saddam Hussein, was installed by:
a) Iraq
b) USSR
c) The US behind a revolution begun by the CIA

The rebel fighters that are now training terrorists were trained by:
a) Hell, we all know it was the USA fighting the soviets through the Afghan
people, no other choices needed

From: Jason Horrocks [mailto:bubbagoodnessrecipes@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 7:59 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Very good Governor

 
I dont know if this site is all it is cracked up to be.  It blatenly misleads its readers.  Did you know that the Michigan State Senate and State house are both "Conservative Repuplican" ran?  This means that all these laws that you are bashing Grandholm for signing originated from your buddies.  Or are you bashing her for agreeing with your pals?
 
Jason Horrocks
 
P.S.  Dont blame the liberals from the Michigan Supreme court for not overturning  those laws, because it is Conservative ran 5-2.

From: John Cartwright [mailto:jwmcartwright@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 11:18 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Democrats are NOT racist

 
I read your little article on how democrats are racist and not tolerant of other people and religions.  May I remind you of how the Democrat party and the Republican party of the 1860's have completely switched spots on education and other kinds of things?  Or how many of the modern-day Democrats are simply showing the conservative side that dwells inside us all when they make their racist comments?  Or how Rush Limbaugh made extremely blatent, biased, and racist comments about Native Americans as having been savages before whites came, while these whites were not living under democracy, like the natives?  Mabye you should reevaluate your positions on certain issues.
 
DiegoAmerezRocks!

From: Karl VanEvery [mailto:kvanevery@qwest.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 11:24 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: The right answer

Really a long but misinformed and pointless article. We all know that there are racists everywhere. THe most virulent are southerners. Most southerners used to be democrats from the democratic party. Now most are republicks from the republick party. Your history is often correct but your final paragraph is not an argument you supported. Take some time and look for similar problems in the republick party and you will find them to be rampant.


From: Megan Fischer [mailto:fischerml@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sun 10/17/2004 10:57 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject:

 
you guys think in black and white. You twist
everything Kerry says out of context and you call
people Anti-American for having something different to
say.  You are as fascist as Saddam Hussein.
 

From: YRFAVSOB@aol.com [mailto:YRFAVSOB@aol.com]
Sent: Sun 10/10/2004 5:15 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: The Left and those wacky WMD's

 
I think that all of the people you have quoted were using the same weak intelligence information. Don't forget that Rummy, Wofie & Perl also wrote a letter to Clinton in May 1998 urging the invasion of Iraq. R,W & P used either a Federalist Society letterhead or PNAC - they have the same vision for the future.
 
Have you read any of Doug Rokke's speeches or articles on WMD? I'll bet not. He spent 36 years in the US Army as a Medical Physicist and was in Iraq in 1991 when the Army blew up all of the WMD locations. He said "we knew where they all were and we blew them all up." He also added that fact is in Schwartkopf's autobiography. Iraq was supported to varying degrees between 1959 and 1991 by the US/CIA. Hussein's chemical agents were not made with a chemistry set by Iraqi's - they were largely supplied by your hero types, amongst them G.H.W. Bush (former CIA Director) and Ollie North working his Iran-Contra scheme for Reagan.
 
Cheney/Bush are in Iraq for the money. It's no stupid "moralist" crusade -- they aren't that type. Cheney is a ruthless cutthroat and Bush the Village Idiot.
 
I am an independent ... not a liberal scum  Democrat or a nazi fascist Republican. I don't use the word HATE  like inbred conservatives do - it's a waste of energy. I have found your website both entertaining and amusing keep up the humor!

From: trek rydr [mailto:trek_rydr@yahoo.com]
Sent: Fri 10/8/2004 11:29 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Love thy neighbor

 
big anti-union talk from someone who has never worked
for a union. what you may not realize, is the fact
that the good honest wage the people like my self make
is because of the bargining power of the unions.
without a union in my workplace, i stand to make
significantly less than what i do now. healthcare
probably dwindles down to almost nothing, and the
unsafe and toxic conditions i am exposed to everyday
would basically go by the wayside.

From: SK [mailto:almost_but_not_quite@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wed 9/22/2004 9:07 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject:

 

I know that this message is somehow going to appear in the Hate Mail section. What I'd like you, and anyone else who reads this to do is a little experiment. Count how much 'hate mail' here is badly spelled, full of threats abuse and swearing, or in capitals. Then compare that to the hate mail that liberal sites recieve. Try turnleft.com. Compare.
 
What I don't get is the 'French surrenderers'. The French have not surrendrred, they have been brave in standing up to a belligirent superpower, and opposing it's ridiculous war. The true cowards are the governments in Britain and Australia, which will almost certainly be replaced by the British and Australian people at the next election. True, the French surrendered without much of a fight during World War II. But so would anyone in the face of German invasion. The 'New Europe' you are so keen upon did. The British Channel Islanders did. Even the Russians seemed powerless for a while. It is easy for you to sneer because America has never faced an invasion from a superior enemy. If it had, it would have surrendered eventually as well.
 
And now onto weapons of mass destruction. You don't give up, do you? If Iraq had them, why would your government need to forge evidence? Why didn't they let the weapons inspectors finish their job? Why did they invade just as Iraq was had destroyed a significant number of missiles which broke minor laws? And why is the focus now shifted from WMD to the welfare of the Iraqi people?
 
You claim that any war must destroy a worse evil than it creates. That is why WWII was justified. But the war in Iraq has created a much worse evil, for America and for the Iraqi people - who Bush claims the war was meant to liberate.
 
As a conservative, I assume that you arein favour of competition in business. Why not in politics? If your stance is so much stronger, then why not accept the existence of the Left?

From: Joshua Simpson [mailto:us_soldierz@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sun 8/8/2004 2:05 PM
To: Web Master
Subject: The content of your site

 
As a US Army soldier who just ETSed, and spent 9 months in Iraq, I would
like to say that your website is probably the stupidest fucking thing I have
ever seen in my life.  To all you fucking pussie Republicans, who are
content to send me and my buddies to a war without a cause:  WHY DON'T YOU
SIGN UP FOR THE MILITARY, YOU FUCKING PANSY FUCKS!!! See how you like being
in a country where you get paid below minimum wage to help people who don't
want to be fucking helped, while some fucking civilian gets paid 20 times
more to be escorted by you to oil fields to check their conditions.
Wake up Americans.  At least Kerry had the balls to go to Vietnam.  Fucking
Georgie Boy was sitting around with his dick in his hands, not even showing
up for formations.  What a pussy.  What ever happened to the tough
Republicans of yesteryear?  They all fly the chicken coop? I would have
support McCaine if he had ran.  But Bush had to fucking alienate him too.
Joshua Simpson

From: gewininc [mailto:gewininc@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wed 8/4/2004 7:58 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Kerry for nothing

 
 
So why when I google "bush family history fraud" and I start reading does my hair stand on end?  203,000 hits?  Most have to do with Bush.
But Kerry family history fraud and most have to do with Bush.... Kerry's family was test pilots, post office worker...Gee, not millionaires?
 
Why when a 911 commission, that the president absolutely fought against, does it say that there was no sense of urgency after 2000?
Why did everyone go on vacation after learning that there was a HUGE increase of terrorist chatter indicating that there was going to be an attack?
 
google "bush family history fraud" 
 
Why does this administration reuse to abide by ANY law?
Why do Bush people always use cuss words and rhetoric to prove their point?  Instead of links like the anti-Bush people do?
Why has so many of the Bush family records disappeared in fires like Jr's federal and state military flight records?  His driving records?  Corporate records?
 
google "bush family history fraud" 
 
and you will find out also.  But then you ALREADY KNOW...don't you?  Who's paying you?
 
So many taken by so few for so much.
 
It's good to be adamant, but it's also good to be right and FAIR.
 
To be fair, you HAVE to look at the family history, their connections, their money, their businesses that the US confiscated because of trading with Hitler's Germany.
 
I feel for Bush, with a family history like that, I'd have been on drugs and alcohol too.
 
But by the sounds of your hate philosophy, maybe you approve of that style of life.for our presidents.  Or just more rhetoric to inflame the masses, huh?
 
google "bush family history fraud" 
 
Personally, after 6 yrs in the Guard, wanting a pilot slot, and top of the qualifications, I know where MY records are AND their Federal counterparts.  Plus, stupid me, I kept a copy of them as a remembrance of a great accomplishment.
 
If this IS a real personal website, which it seems to be only one thing in mind, to kill Democrats or Just Liberals, it sure seems that this would be the exact thing the Republicans claim about the Democrats as having. 
 
But then, isn't that the way they work now?  Always claim the Dems are doing what YOU are doing?  Beat them to the punch!  Works good.
 
google "bush family history fraud" 
 
Makes me sick.  The present republican party is being run as a mafia, the president is the puppet commander of a Dynasty family, and you are his expendable masses.
 
Talk about wake up and smell the coffee.
 
It took me four years of researching, and I was physically shaken when I realized the extent that this family had their fingers in every pie around. 
 
From financing Hitler to the Bush's being friends with the Hinkleys.
 
google "bush family history fraud" 
 
Come on, like your site says, it takes some one awful brave to be ready to give up everything, but in your case, hopefully it's just your ego.  Maybe you could vent your anger at the CRIMINAL element in our corporation, and become a champion of the people instead of THAT twisted, evil group.  Doesn't pay as much, I'm sure.  But you could sleep better at night.
 
Have a nice day.
 
ex-Capt USAFR, 72-82.

From: Olindfidel@aol.com [mailto:Olindfidel@aol.com]
Sent: Fri 7/30/2004 3:03 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Brendan Rocks!!!

 
sir
bush was a coward and cheny was to.insted of going to Vietnam he was a drunk and a drugie,cheny was just scared. bush froze then he lied now 900 killed 14000 injured. you no safer ask the Americans who say they are Canadian

From: Olindfidel@aol.com [mailto:Olindfidel@aol.com]
Sent: Fri 7/30/2004 2:57 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Those wacky french

 
sir
      I was in the French military 5 years before that 9 years British army. So yes I was in the French foreign legion. Who are by far better than any troops you have in those 5 years I trained with your marines doing the jungle warfare coarse in south amercia,your marines did not do that good. Also in Africa while in the legion in a march against your marines 100mile across the dessert no one in the legion drooped out but your poor sad marines I am afraid quite a few drooped out. In the legion airborne we had a SF section it was made up of Brits Italian polish German Spanish no American Evan do there were a few in the rgt none were fit enough and they were ex marines seals So please don't put the French army down ask anyone who knows about the legion and they will tell you they are more than a match for anyone of your American army units you make a fool of yourself
 
      proud ex French foreign legion Tony

From: Peter Belfiore [mailto:rat89@optonline.net]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 6:05 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Go back to school and actually learn somthing

 

    I personally think this site is built on lies and groundless arguments made against so called "liberals" I'm not sure why you think you can name someone a "liberal" and then consider it a detriment to their personality.    You've created two sides to an argument, now, doesn't that make it simple for someone to comprehend? Obviously you don't make "thinking" a forte in your life if you think you can take one side to an argument which you have created.  A child using their imagination to occupy themselves in their spare time, that's what I would say you have created here.

    In one article on your site you told these so called "liberals" to go hug a tree and eat some seaweed or whatever but make sure you do it in France. Sounds to me like you have no idea what your talking about, creating more labels and stereotypes don't we have enough of those? This is typical with someone as poorly educated as I might think someone who wrote this site would do.

    Of course Bush is a "hero" oh yes killing those bad Iraqi's they deserve what they got. Now we feel safe, Saddam is gone and the terrorist threat is starting to fade. What I don't understand about this whole situation is that not many people have asked the question why?

thWhy was Iraq such a threat to us? Then the answer to that question would be Saddam doesn't like us, he's harboring terrorists, oh my gosh hes definately a threat, oops but Saudi Arabia is too, no they are our allies we can't bomb them. Oh well guess we should bomb Saddam right? Wonder where those weapons of mass destruction went maybe there weren't any have you ever thought of that. Have you ever thought that Iraq had nothing to do with Sept. 11 or for that matter any terrorist attacks made on U.S. soil?

    Now everything is better, Iraq is in our control. Of course countless of Iraqi's were killed, wonder what the father of that Iraqi boy will think about America now that his son was blown in half by a 2 ton bomb. Not to mention the hundreds of American Soldiers who have been killed occupying Iraq. Maybe this will appeal to you the fact that over 800 soldiers were killed and the number is rising and the worst thing about it is that these soldiers are dying for nothing. Such an extreme statement but its the truth, think of the mother of the soldier shot in the head by an Iraqi sniper on mothers day weekend while he was directing traffic. Imagine the suffering she is going through, the loss of her offspring, her child, the one who grew up and went off to fight for our country. That country that provides so much for us, but you, you traitors sit at home in your comfy bed and room saying those Muslim bastards got what they deserve. Those "Muslim Bastards" only exist because of your ignorance and total willingness to wholeheartedly support  genocide. You rival Hitler in your evil crusade to turn American brains to mush and follow every bold statement your government makes against those people that are "different" from you, those that believe in somthing other than the crap that is fed to us. Now our own flesh and blood are out there dying because you think those people should be slaughtered. Don't forget that we are after TERRORISTS not muslims, obviously you didn't realize that when we attacked Iraq we weren't taking out terrorists as we should have been doing. I don't think I will ever know why we did go into Iraq because the reasons I have been given do not fit together.

    Yes Saddam is a bad man, a dictator, but does that give us a reason to invade his country out of nowhere. We have no right to interfere with a country's affairs because "we dont like them". Iraq was no threat to us, and our founding fathers even told us to stay out of international affairs, that didn't stop us though. Our founding fathers would be weeping right now if they could see what horrible bastards we have become. Oh but I see you havn't read up on your history particularly the section titled "The Vietnam War". This is the same situation, soldiers dying for another stupid reason except this time there is no reason.

     Yes, now our soldiers are dying and our international integrity is shattered, wish France could take the blame along with us. Unfortunately for us France never took part in this groundless war, for good reasons not sticking their nose into other people's business, but they're not fighting our silly little war so they must suck right? I am appauled at the extreme stupidity in your arguments against France, in all of them you stray so far from the reason you "say" you hate France bashing them on every stereotype you could possibly fabricate. You call them "pussys" because they aren't getting horribly slaughtered by pissed of muslims who's reason for being pissed off is only natural. bombing their country is a good reason for being angry.

    Now I know what you are going to say about this letter, "typical liberal, treehugging, bullshit". Well, I don't know how I could respond to that since you made that title up yourself. All I can say is, don't hide behind this offensive collection of untrue's you have created. Consider all sides of the argument, not the "bad ass, we are number one" attitude you comfort yourself with. Like all things in life it's not as simple as left and right. You should come out of your blocked off corner (nicely situated on the so called "right") filled with your opinions and the so called facts you create to back them up with. Don't blindly hate like you do so much, it hurts you along with the people you hate faithfully.


From: Name removed by request [mailto:Email Address removed by request]
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2004 11:24 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Kerry for nothing
 

Hey, I'd rather have a liberast asshole than a war/oil/corporation crazy asshole. You rich bastard, you.


~Removed by request


From: Mikael Frosthage [mailto:frosthag@itstud.chalmers.se]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 8:56 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: The right answer


Hello! Just wanted to say that i enjoy your site very much. Whenever I feel like I need a good laugh I visit your page, and I'm never dissapointed. For instance, your "article"
http://www.liberalscum.com/worstpresident.html must have been the best one yet. I mean comparing FDR with Bush is just insaine. Japan had an alliance with germany so even though germany didn't attack US soil, they declared war on you and started to attack american ships with their U-boats. Do you really think that iraq was a bigger threat than the combined might of germany and japan?? Bush was just trigger happy and thought it was cool to invade iraq.

>We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for LESS
>TIME THAN IT TOOK HILLARY CLINTON TO LOCATE THE ROSE LAW FIRM RECORDS
>IN HER OWN OFFICE!

Stop yelling! Ehh, they searched for almost a year and guess what, they have not found ANY WMD's. period! They were all destroyed before US invaded iraq!!!

>And Finally...
>IT TOOK LESS TIME FOR THE U.S. MILITARY TO TAKE IRAQ THAN IT DID TO
>COUNT THE VOTES IN FLORIDA IN 2000!!!!

Actually you havn't really succeeded yet. Just take a look! some 200 US soildiers has died 1 year after "mission accomplished". And if you watch something else than fox news you will reallise that it is actually getting worse over there.

//Mike


From: AndyRandall2@aol.com [mailto:AndyRandall2@aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 7:34 PM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Liberal damn Governor

 
Get a life scumwebmaster.  When the fed (which by the way your buddies fully control) creates a website labeling system you will not be able to be anonymous anymore.  At that point you will get a fist in the mouth for disparaging a man's wife and a child's mother.

From: George Bell [mailto:gab9@jps.net]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 12:51 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: Rich people are evil people.

 
whoever wrote this erroneous, foolish, empty and evil story about the harm of liberal treatment of people is a complete monster.  I think he, mostly a guy wrote this, so he should stop using trite metaphors and seek to find why it is he wants to maintain this completely atrocious notion that being kind to people, which is the definiton of liberal and being caring and compassionate is anything but the best?
 
     Meanwhile, in this last sentence where you wrote a bunch of ill-housed ideas about how The Democrats are the party of the rich, whose erroding the democracy and squashing the little guy.  Well I'm for rights for everyone, and for everyone flourishing, and for humanity.  The thing is, is that your story should include talk about all bad people because you totally invalidate yourself as a person of respect when you concentrate all of your energy on certain bad people to protect the policies of specific other hateful people, which is a complete contradiction to the platform of caring about the little guy. 
    It confounds me in a way but, i know that so many are such fucking idiots who do not want to believe, and so they go on sleeping along to the detrement of themselves and everyone else...  Why can't you stop yourself from being this way?  I know you're powerful enough, i care about family farms.  I don't even like Democrats.  You discredit yourself because it's obvious you really don't care about the things you seem to think "liberals" are vanquishing.  Check yourself first please, and realize hopefully  this helps and this is why i'm writing .

From: Mike Ferrence [mailto:mikeferrence@msn.com]
Sent: Tue 12/16/2003 10:53 AM
To: Opinions Mailbox
Subject: The right answer

 

Tell me about AWOL BUSH and his Swindling brothers. The ones that Bush money keep out of the press.  How about daddy buying a Yale Diploma for the boy with a drinking problem.  GEORGE'S FAILED OIL BUSINESS'S.  He will go down in history as the worst pres ever.  He got Houssein but his friend ken Lay will walk just like his brothers

The Screaming Muse [The_Screaming_Muse@ShitDisturber.com]

We would like to make some comments on this article;

* It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take

the Branch Davidian compound (that was a 51-day operation)

* It took less time to find evidence of chemical weapons in

Iraq than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm

billing records.

Did you know that those in charge of the "finding weapons of mass destruction" plan still cannot produce any weapons - therefore they cannot produce any reason for the war in Iraq?

 

* It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the

Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took

Teddy Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sunk at

Chappaquiddick.

Fighting off a handful of poorly-armed and grossly outnumbered peasants when your own army has tens of thousands and moron-proof weapons is hardly an issue to brag about.

* It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the

votes in Florida in 2000!

Again, bragging about how corrupt one's government is seems obtuse at best and idiotic and ignorant at worst. You seem to be very fervent in the opinions on your page, yet invalidate your points and do your cause a disservice by not researching and choosing to remain ignorant.

Just a piece of advice,

The Screaming Muse Society

P.S. Considering that your troops were fighting for "democracy and freedom", and considering that those two philosophies are touted as being what makes your country great, is it not highly hypocritical to deny others their opinions simply because they conflict with your own? Is not making everyone agree with one person or group's opinion fascism?

_____________________________________________________________

Sign Up For E-Mail Service at http://www.ShitDisturber.com -- It's Powerful, Fun and Free!


James P Berka [jpberka@comcast.net]

To whom it may concern:

 
Regarding:  Your racist poem
 
I suppose you've gotten your point out with this poem.  I hope it makes you feel better.  Frankly, I hope my tax money goes toward allowing a whole family of people you don't like to move in next door to you.  ;-)
 
By the way, in case you hadn't noticed when you wrote the line  "We think America darn good place!  Too darn good for the white man race."  Not all tax paying Americans are WHITE.  In fact, there are lots of them that aren't.  So before you go begging all tax paying Americans to spread your idiocy, it might be a good idea for you to consider writing something slightly less offensive to the people you're trying to supposedly reach.  Well, second thought, you probably don't care much if you reach the tax payers who aren't white. 
 
I hope you don't really mean what you wrote in that poem, but if you did, I hope that you can find some tolerance for others.

 
 
Peace,
 
James P Berka

stuart estrine [estrine@earthlink.net]

What will you traitors say when "president' Bush is impeached for violating United States Code Title 18,
Crimes And Criminal Procedure - Part 1 - Crimes,
Chapter 19 - Conspiracy.
Section 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States.
Seriously, he has a major problem. He, along with Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz engaged in a conspiracy to defraud the USA. There were no weapons of mass destruction, there was no nuclear program, there was no imminent threat to the USA. Wait a minute. Can you be impeached if you were never elected?
 
--- stuart estrine
--- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet.

 

 

 

 


E-MAIL THIS LINK
Enter recipient's e-mail:


Back to Hate Mail Directory

Let me know your thoughts.

Back to Liberalscum.com

 
 

Legal Crap